Method for production of a spectacle glass taking into account the optimum individual length of progression

ABSTRACT

Disclosed is a method for determining the optimum individual length of progression of a progressive lens using the measured distance between the vertex of the cornea and a pre-adapted spectacle frame. The invention is characterized by the following steps: a) measurement of the individual distance (HSA) between the vertex of the cornea and a pre-adapted spectacle frame; b) measurement of the individual distance between a distant reference point B F  and a centering cross Z K ; c) determination of the optimum and individual length of progression (L opt ) according to the following formula: L opt   =0.63 *(HSA+ 13.5  mm)+d(B F , ZK).

DESCRIPTION

[0001] 1. Technical Field

[0002] This invention relates to a method for determining the optimum and individual progression length of a continuous vision lens on the basis of the measured cornea/bridge distance of a spectacle frame which has been matched in advance.

[0003] 2. Prior Art

[0004] Virtually all lens manufacturers use a product-dependent standard value of approximately 22 mm for the progression length L of continuous vision lenses.

[0005] Particularly for frames having a small lens height, some manufacturers additionally offer shorter progression lengths which, in some cases may be only 14 mm.

[0006] However, no method is known from the prior art that defines the progression length of a continuous vision lens taking into account the cornea/bridge distance (HSA) of the frame which has been matched in advance.

[0007] A standard progression length of 22 mm becomes disadvantageous as soon as the cornea/bridge distance is greater or less than a specific mean value (15 mm), so that the spectacle lens is no longer seated in front of the eye center of rotation on the basis of an empirically determined in-use position. This is also true when shorter progression lengths must be used because of the chosen frame and/or different in-use conditions.

[0008] On the basis of the empirically determined in-use position, a fixed progression length of 22 mm is optimum only for a mean HSA of 15 mm. For a shorter HSA, the view must be lowered further downwards, and if the HSA is higher, the near reference point is reached with a reduced viewing deflection.

[0009] On the basis of empirical values, the view is lowered with respect to the horizontal viewing deflection through approximately 32 degrees when reading (which is generally found to be acceptable for most users). If, on the basis of the frame chosen by the end user, the HSA differs from the standard HSA, the viewing deflection to achieve full addition or to look through the near reference point B_(N) no longer corresponds to the empirically determined in-use position. This may necessitate holding the head in an unpleasant position or moving the eyes in an unpleasant manner for the wearer of continuous vision lenses. If the HSA is relatively small (for example 10 nm), the head or the eyes must be lowered (if this is possible at all), while if the HSA is greater (for example 20 mm), the head or the eyes must be raised unnaturally.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0010] The invention is based on the object of specifying a method by means of which the optimum and individual progression length of a continuous vision lens can be determined on the basis of the measured cornea/bridge distance of a spectacle frame which has been matched in advance, or the discrepancy which results from the measured HSA from a shorter progression length, which is determined for example by the spectacle frame.

[0011] The object is achieved by a method as claimed in claim 1, which is characterized by the following steps:

[0012] a) The value of the individual cornea/bridge distance (HSA) of a spectacle frame which has been matched in advance is obtained,

[0013] b) The individual distance d between a far reference point B_(F) and a centering cross Z_(K) is measured, and

[0014] c) The optimum and individual progression length (L_(opt)) is determined using the following formula:

L _(opt)=0.63*(HSA+13.5 mm)+d(B _(F) , ZK).

[0015] The value of 13.5 mm can be varied if the progression length is intended to be shorter than the initially mentioned progression length standard value of 22 mm.

[0016] This determined progression length can be reported to the lens manufacturer, who then calculates and produces a continuous vision lens with this individual progression length.

[0017] The calculation procedure may, in particular, be as follows:

[0018] Three different positions of a spectacle lens are considered, with a fixed progression length, in front of the eye center of rotation Z′ corresponding to three different HSAs.

[0019] The forward inclination of the plane of the frame is, for example, 0 degrees and the DIN distance between the eye center of rotation and the apex of the cornea is 13.5 mm. B_(F) denotes the far reference point, B_(N) denotes the near reference point; the progression length L is the distance between B_(F) and B_(N), and ZK denotes the centering cross (in accordance with DIN and ISO).

[0020] According to the invention, the optimum, individual progression length is calculated using the following relationship:

[0021] The viewing angle α between the near reference point B_(N) and the centering cross ZK for optimum reading at the near reference point corresponds, with a progression length of 22 mm and an HSA of 15 mm, to approximately 32.3 degrees based on the empirically determined in-use position.

tan(32.3°)=distance (B _(N) ,ZK)/(HSA+13.5 mm)

[0022] In this case, 13.5 mm is the DIN or ISO distance from the eye center of rotation to the apex of the cornea. Then:

L _(opt)=0.63*(HSA+13.5 mm)+d(B_(F) ,ZK).

[0023] If the measured HSA for a frame which has been matched in advance is substituted in the above formula, then this results in the optimum individual progression length of the continuous vision lens.

[0024] If the distance between ZK and B_(F) is 4 mm, this results in an optimum progression length of 18.8 mm for an HSA of 20 mm. This apparently demonstrates the major discrepancies between the individual progression length and the standard progression length of 22 mm.

[0025] In addition the forward inclination of the plane of the frame and the strength of the spectacle lens (sphere, cylinder, axis, prism, base) can be taken into account in the individual calculation of the continuous vision lens. 

1. A method for production of a progressive spectacle lens having at least one progressive surface, in which the at least one progressive surface is calculated taking account of individual data, such as the cornea/bridge distance, of the spectacle lens, such that, at pronounced parts on a main line and in particular at the so-called far reference point (B_(F)) and the near reference point (B_(N)), the spectacle lens has a specific effect which is predetermined by a spectacle prescription, characterized by the following steps: the individual cornea/bridge distance (HSA) for a spectacle frame, which is selected by the spectacle wearer and is matched in advance, is measured, the optimum, individual progression length (L_(opt)) for the spectacle frame which has been matched in advance, that is to say the distance between the far reference point and the near reference point in the direction of the vertical in the in-use position is determined by means of the following relationship: L _(opt)=tan(32.3°±°)*(HSA+13.5 mm)+d(B _(F) , ZK), where; HSA: cornea/ridge distance d(B_(F), ZK): Distance between the far reference point and the centering cross the progressive surface of the spectacle lens is calculated such that the determined individual progression length L_(OPT) is obtained, and the spectacle lens is manufactured in accordance with the calculated data.
 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: 3mm≦d(B _(F) ,ZK)≦5 mm and in particular d(B _(F) ,ZK)=4 mm.
 3. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that, in order to determine the value of d(B_(F), ZK) the individual distance d is determined between the far reference point B_(F), the intersection point of a straight line (0°—viewing direction) which runs through the eye center of rotation Z′ and runs horizontally, through the plane of the frame, and a centering cross Z_(K).
 4. The method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that further individual values are taken into account when determining the value of the optimum individual progression length (L_(OPT)).
 5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that a further individual value is the forward inclination of the plane of the frame.
 6. The method as claimed in claim 4 or 5, characterized in that further individual values are the spherical effect, the addition, the astigmatic effect and the axis position as well as the prism and the base of the prism.
 7. The method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 6, characterized by the following association between the cornea/bridge distance HSA and the individual progression length, L_(opt): HSA L_(opt) 10 mm 18.8 mm 15 mm   22 mm 20 mm 25.1 mm


8. The method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the spectacle lens and, in particular, the progressive surface are calculated in the in-use position. 